Three ways to work with the measurement.
License the software and keep the analysis in your own hands, read analysis we have already run, or commission it on your own question.
Tools your team holds.
The difference from a commissioned analysis is who holds the work. Your team builds the comparison and re-runs it whenever the question comes back. Three tools, each built around one recurring decision. Each rests on the same measurement: how fast a technology is improving, estimated for 150,000+ technologies before commercial numbers exist.
Read analysis we have already run.
Where a comparison is useful to more than one team, we write it up. Three are in preparation now, listed below. The method applies to any technology sector, and we write to commission in any of them.
Competing qubit architectures compared against each other, with the error-correction results that changed the picture.
Cell chemistries and formats on their own curves, rather than one blended figure for “batteries.”
Advanced packaging, heterogeneous integration and the domains under them, built alongside our coalition work.
One note when each is finished, with one finding from it. No sequence.
Tell us what you need analysed.
These are the four questions we take on most often. Each is scoped the same way: you bring the question and the inputs, we agree the scope and the fee before work begins.
Tell us what you want analysed. We map the related domains first, then decide together what deserves a closer look. Sometimes that ends with a shorter list and no further work, which is a fine result.
Bring the area, we'll help you narrow it →